From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GFDbu-0007pK-Ke for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:30:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7LHTWhi029030; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:29:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LHRSDi022110 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:27:28 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EBA645C6 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1969 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2006 13:21:34 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 13:21:34 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mulltiib cruft: /emul Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:28:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: Olivier =?iso-8859-1?q?Cr=EAte?= References: <200608081143.13375.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060821112146.GA9859@trantor.devurandom.co.uk> <1156170558.7841.6.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> In-Reply-To: <1156170558.7841.6.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1804166.3taOW89hLp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608211328.37602.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 82b95bff-e1b8-4d32-b880-12d90a3c6b16 X-Archives-Hash: 83583b263a67d77d3e3e2875d59e9c69 --nextPart1804166.3taOW89hLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 August 2006 10:29, Olivier Cr=EAte wrote: > On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 12:21 +0100, Herbie Hopkins wrote: > > I've always viewed the emul libs as a temporary measure until we had fu= ll > > multilib fuctionality in portage. Afaik the only person working on this > > was eradicator who has been mia for a while now so I'm unsure weather > > this is ever likely to arise. Given that it looks like we'll be stuck > > with these binary libs for some time yet then we may as well do as you > > suggest and install them in a standard location to make building against > > them a bit easier. I'll look into doing this when I next version bump t= he > > packages. > > I still believe we should reserve the regular directory for the real > multilib stuff, otherwise it will be very painful when we decide to > move. And continue to put the stopgap binary packages in /emul. why ? this is what blockers are for =2Dmike --nextPart1804166.3taOW89hLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAROntRUFjO5/oN/WBAQK0KRAApHuegn0g0OgHE4L/fXpPTqNDtujh711K EpRH9yyYrDpmzIbn4+PH/DeFswLF50FfsoPoO4M84U8cEym3y3oEA6YXNkiHFtws PknYOy9wR65VEGJfErorx+MYaIWehN6nAm/0PUE7ottAt3JzTHm4fYD8PoYkMvvm rHe+RyWxggg/oMEJ0kGUMmpssobSJf7GCuMdGSVefFSnkjyn97Z5wa/rg/+sboAg 2Ub4yRn6dwsveJbLktk6ioTYFYQ+tnLuhGFvS9qmswRPbgJDQQQoqAe8BKso3Mt9 uLmi4Vqy3Tmgd9ZXknS+LXyPIgzkNQlzGYuQtH4rhqnLXCXGVY4U4PngHXi2oJEp Ckp4bvQ9ZV52YBhYmUHrOnlZRgfdGYF0cMkf1tOnFNueVuo6/ingd/7jNFv+yGLb GPzRk8NxUjtO6iyrtbP/wRC26gEt3+DE21UW4tRWpBLGv80I5KGoihPx7sx26AOv NGqlURCi9XP2vxtIE5e/R4u8GboEeOL+w66tQCWCWBOT4iBYyby2xz+9fyhHCARW AcIQshv1uY8RtrbWyhBtI8B6T4eh7NczoSZqgKeNQuHFB500P1ip0Ue/eYsj2EBH X+BSQVLR/dvxX5gxNT8x5fSy4SqvyvQhA9eK6yFI9jPA6uhfoNR/4QTxrXcoOnHb rsYa9DW0d34= =kHRN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1804166.3taOW89hLp-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list