On Monday 21 August 2006 10:29, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 12:21 +0100, Herbie Hopkins wrote:
> > I've always viewed the emul libs as a temporary measure until we had full
> > multilib fuctionality in portage. Afaik the only person working on this
> > was eradicator who has been mia for a while now so I'm unsure weather
> > this is ever likely to arise. Given that it looks like we'll be stuck
> > with these binary libs for some time yet then we may as well do as you
> > suggest and install them in a standard location to make building against
> > them a bit easier. I'll look into doing this when I next version bump the
> > packages.
>
> I still believe we should reserve the regular directory for the real
> multilib stuff, otherwise it will be very painful when we decide to
> move. And continue to put the stopgap binary packages in /emul.

why ?  this is what blockers are for
-mike