From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GAs32-0000si-2Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:40:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k79HdENk023673; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:39:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k79HZVbh027215 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:35:31 GMT Received: from phi.witten.lan (p83.129.2.232.tisdip.tiscali.de [83.129.2.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9E7642CA for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:35:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Danny van Dyk Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mulltiib cruft: /emul Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:46:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200608081143.13375.vapier@gentoo.org> <200608091150.18800.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200608091150.18800.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Face: =?utf-8?q?57Z3foFdBj=3BKdmU=5EFM=2Eec=5C4=7BQf/F6=25ePh=5C=5DM=5EaXPX*=5D?= =?utf-8?q?J5S=7CM=7E+vR=3F=24iW=5Cn44=5E2sguPTOtw=0A=09fe+7gKTm*!OXGQPYqML?= =?utf-8?q?=7CL1ezSI3-=27E=25zxZigvAK?=>3$?~'4IPBoi\H2)pV6U(26V@ =?utf-8?q?jq=7CAIp=0A=09yY?=>'!D}EOi=Q+-|CIh-d4riWfZZ">G.Rj!}78kX$8Zt0:epNWTo[{_/zJb< =?utf-8?q?Ud=2Eon=7EprEW*=0A=09tIvqI=7B+e=3AgMC?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608091946.31963.kugelfang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b93e2871-6ab4-4d48-89e7-0c53ad8b0161 X-Archives-Hash: 8fc8e950c0be9e83b80d0ce7cb3ca5ca Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2006 17:50 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:57, Duncan wrote: > > Mike Frysinger posted > > Pure speculation here, but the idea /might/ have been to separate > > prebuilt binary stuff into /emul, so it wouldn't conflict with > > future multiarch portage support (which would presumably use > > /lib32), which IIRC was hoped to be here by now, but turned out to > > be rather complicated and had no portage devs which had that > > particular itch they needed to scratch, so... (IOW, no blame or > > finger pointing, just that we'd hoped it'd be here by 2.1, and it > > isn't, and that's a fact amd64 continues to have to deal with.) > > from what i remember, /emul was done because that's how some other > distro was doing it ... but at the time i was staying out of multilib > development because it sucked and i didnt have an amd64 > > now i have an amd64 and this current state annoys me greatly, so > rather than bitch all the time, i want to fix it Herbs is maintaing the emul-libraries. IMHO it shouldn't be to hard to change it from /emul to /lib32 and /usr/lib32. And yes, /emul was there from the very beginning aka Tester/brad_mssw :-) Danny -- Danny van Dyk Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list