From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GAAEy-0002yA-B1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:54:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k77Ir881026883; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:53:08 GMT Received: from forum.psychotherapie.org (s15216962.onlinehome-server.info [217.160.22.205]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k77InMxU031669 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:49:22 GMT Received: (from uucp@localhost) by forum.psychotherapie.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/SuSE Linux 0.7) with UUCP id k77InNsR030621 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:49:23 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id k77ImbMp022733 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:48:37 +0200 Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:48:37 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax Message-ID: <20060807184837.GB18220@nibiru.local> References: <7B97065F451A23458ED0C63B4CA5A2EA1D2914@SRV-EXCHANGE.AUTOonline.local> <20060807132644.GG25236@nibiru.local> <20060807105322.8e3fe6cd.tcort@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060807105322.8e3fe6cd.tcort@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Archives-Salt: 72cbc043-4f48-4a74-97c5-7ba6a1c7da8f X-Archives-Hash: 4b4883882ec6045889b88ac156e83498 * Thomas Cort schrieb: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:26:44 +0200 > Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > The bad thing is that those things don't get neither into the upstrem > > nor other distros. > > ^--- This should be a warning flag ---^ > > If other distros aren't doing it and upstream isn't doing it, then it > may no be that great of an idea. Not really. Simply seems that no one else cares about the Debian patches, since they don't do enough publicity. They simply fix some problems at their side and are done with this. Same for other many distros. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list