From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G9UdS-0001n6-GB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:28:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k75MRkD3007469; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 22:27:46 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k75MPt68021095 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 22:25:55 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45E4644DB for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4484 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2006 18:25:07 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2006 18:25:07 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] implicit RDEPEND Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:26:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200608051612.04891.phreak@gentoo.org> <200608051608.40344.vapier@gentoo.org> <44D50DD5.9040307@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44D50DD5.9040307@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4028406.qLENmeqZZs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608051826.02842.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 181c49ec-d49f-4d5d-a1f2-a1eb0f688498 X-Archives-Hash: de2e92959ac4b3c873aae1ad43acd5f3 --nextPart4028406.qLENmeqZZs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:29, Zac Medico wrote: > I'm not satisfied with the current implicit RDEPEND behavior either. I > propose that we make repoman force explicit definition of RDEPEND. and i'm on the opposite side where implicit RDEPEND should be clean: =2D eclass and ebuilds have their own sets of DEPEND/RDEPEND which do not i= n any=20 way affect each other =2D RDEPEND, if not set, is defined as $DEPEND > After=20 > all of the ebuilds have been fixed to stop relying on the implicit > definition, we can fix portage so that it no longer sets RDEPEND implicit= ly > at all. i see it being broken regardless, might as well go for a clean break rather= =20 than putzing around with middle ground =2Dmike --nextPart4028406.qLENmeqZZs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARNUa+kFjO5/oN/WBAQLz+hAA33WCrNyVc4X+BTESk25yc9y4JQp7TsyI Y9wTddGIILY8oOnMCtTF3HFATqmskI2wqo1lmSjpE2zbzz/esiKEUDim62Z5X7Iw timS++LHlCUvoWZ75m3hARDsXbYRXmfpYYg2DFWthHLMYiSFv0h74GLujh67u072 Lm6lqG9v5Y0YuNAuoo/q2wdPuYjNqx9usEgEs3t/2GnXwhAij63H1CSNjXi9Q41a 68EOLfuDmzoMW7qrhPjMCrD3ZI80YAxAvm0Q+izC8U0Il7/Ru7mpkLgn+HXaPazQ K8sZx/XcQ6sLZgvd8jtl8pTPu9OIfcClBaukKUc8J5wcWYJ7GC+XnqxrsaGCUuq2 xkelGDSt3tcwt1zxP7AbPxZ5QcE2EB+4Z3OEM8RX2zmWgKe34pYyFfDdybDA3Co5 sQ6cd9USWkp9SC3GhFpS2dVqwpbVjr9PZpP2Y+tQAuR9QrXHUsb7BMjxwjHmlY8T wB2YM0+y2/MkhPqHGqr34k6ZFdJj4X4MFjPPIMhDb0A+TKqrfaCUfENaSt0e29kT Y7MTiq/RdFyYwAlWXXqff1URIRPXVyFkKjbkvVmYmjv++GGw5qAdgGRoRFw/p5nx WLVhuZ1URgwYgFcLvdV9++k7QNOYmtEUBlX0fbG7byTIsX8jti6IThj+zR6A2zjW Xu2ptW31bDg= =NNK2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4028406.qLENmeqZZs-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list