From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8jn4-0007Fu-BR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:27:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k73KQf4x023915; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:26:41 GMT Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k73KOaEp019995 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:24:37 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust453.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.6.1.198]:38571 helo=localhost) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1G8jkA-0008WB-1L (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:24:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:34:06 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] atom matching behavior Message-ID: <20060803213406.6e1d8b26@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060803070735.61a1e3e9@sven.genone.homeip.net> References: <20060803070735.61a1e3e9@sven.genone.homeip.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 94edc661-07b6-4e95-a825-df757015cd56 X-Archives-Hash: cba1ff79cedfef385c4a5e2a576d3ade On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:07:35 +0200 Marius Mauch wrote: > Opinions? Current behaviour is sub-optimal in many regards, but the tree relies upon it; amongst other examples, packages depending upon =autoconf-2.5* expect to get 2.59. If someone wants to 'fix' all of those, and any other cases that may appear, I'd be for the change. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list