From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8RJy-0005kK-5a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:44:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k730gwEI004549; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 00:42:58 GMT Received: from forum.psychotherapie.org (s15216962.onlinehome-server.info [217.160.22.205]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k730e4hX009200 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 00:40:04 GMT Received: (from uucp@localhost) by forum.psychotherapie.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/SuSE Linux 0.7) with UUCP id k730e3wh007657 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:40:03 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id k730cYOe015557 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:38:34 +0200 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:38:33 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Message-ID: <20060803003833.GD16921@nibiru.local> References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <44ACF6C9.7010209@gentoo.org> <1152200486.605.35.camel@onyx> <20060725121446.GD3488@nibiru.local> <20060725170708.GA3567@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060725170708.GA3567@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Archives-Salt: e585851b-ba30-4261-8b7c-1dc84a99d785 X-Archives-Hash: f59cc14866e094e03dfbacabb50c8a3a * Harald van D??k schrieb: hi, > What would it do if a gcc-specific option is used for which > the real compiler does not provide any option, even with a > different name? hmm, tricky. I've filed an bug in gcc-upstream for an similar issue, where gcc/ld is missing some an flag allowing to filter exported symbols of shared libs. Hopefully this issue will be solved soon by the gcc team. Until then I have to strip off that option, hoping it does not break anything. But nevertheless it would be a great step to adapt at least those options which are supported. Completely unsupported options (which cannot be substituted somehow) are a major problem anyways. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list