From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8RrP-0004r4-M4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:18:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k731HMff018178; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:17:22 GMT Received: from cs.ubishops.ca (inglit.ubishops.ca [206.167.194.132]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k731DbxM013078 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:13:37 GMT Received: from chicago.larrythecow.com (unknown [70.55.179.101]) by cs.ubishops.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FBC3A7A1 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:13:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:13:35 -0400 From: Thomas Cort To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/aim masked for removal Message-Id: <20060802211335.4a0029b5.tcort@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200608021618.08898.electronerd@electronerdia.net> References: <44CE343E.5030208@gentoo.org> <20060802231212.GC16921@nibiru.local> <200608021618.08898.electronerd@electronerdia.net> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__2_Aug_2006_21_13_36_-0400_Y=pCiH70mkPSL=lt" X-Archives-Salt: 44b395da-2c85-4ead-9a2b-005904c9f571 X-Archives-Hash: 107fb51142e22c20e2cbca48cbe352a9 --Signature=_Wed__2_Aug_2006_21_13_36_-0400_Y=pCiH70mkPSL=lt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:18:04 -0700 John Myers wrote: > On Wednesday 02 August 2006 16:12, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > * Donnie Berkholz schrieb: > > > I've masked net-im/aim, AOL's proprietary offering. It hasn't seen a > > > release in years, it's binary-only, and it's far less capable than any > > > other client out there. > > > > BTW: could be introduce an separate (optional) masking method > > for such proprietary stuff ? > > > I believe (don't have time to check right now) you'll want to look into=20 > ACCEPT_LICENSE http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17367 --Signature=_Wed__2_Aug_2006_21_13_36_-0400_Y=pCiH70mkPSL=lt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE0U3NQRqjKWbcq9ERAogMAKDNc46x1iCVu+arrLQQnw/KTJ0DuwCgxKWy aPGLFEDkiRxNSBFNQizeEgk= =mjVF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__2_Aug_2006_21_13_36_-0400_Y=pCiH70mkPSL=lt-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list