From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8LAU-0008Ct-OU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:10:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k72I8KgL032585; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:08:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k72I5Ho9020497 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:05:17 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (d071233.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.71.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37A164497 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:05:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:04:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200608020246.35882.carlo@gentoo.org> <7573e9640608012050n3a9466mfe52c3d3961b56d3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7573e9640608012050n3a9466mfe52c3d3961b56d3@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1370926.USav5OvKcM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608022005.12268.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 64caee00-ff19-4860-8cc1-d781ff87a42b X-Archives-Hash: 01d48fa318d3633c7c1657532fc1b28c --nextPart1370926.USav5OvKcM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 02 August 2006 05:50, Richard Fish wrote: > Nothing that I have read about sunrise, either in GWN, their project > pages, or the FAQ, has given me the impression that they are "urging > all users to give it a try". There is certainly some advertising > about it, as would be appropriate for any new Gentoo project. But > nothing that I would say gives the slightest hint of "pushiness". Well, as long as there's no big fat warning that there's not support, no=20 security team backing it up - and that the overlay is not meant for general= =20 consumption, it's very problematic. On the contrary, it's written down that= =20 the overlay is meant to make a wide range of ebuilds easily available -=20 without any measures to secure its consumers. Carsten --nextPart1370926.USav5OvKcM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBE0OlYVwbzmvGLSW8RAj0AAJsEbX96Pc4ria6doIVT7gl0x33ITwCfbXQz JMpbkLXRPuFGwvzBPDiPhJw= =VY8e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1370926.USav5OvKcM-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list