From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G84xl-0002LI-5m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:51:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k720niO5003901; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:49:44 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k720kdK5027432 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:46:40 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (c213132.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.213.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2DF64813 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:46:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 02:46:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <1154319679.11516.24.camel@localhost> <44CDE300.2040709@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44CDE300.2040709@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3697809.ktX46XAXfx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608020246.35882.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 28c6f995-61de-499f-b39c-24789b079c99 X-Archives-Hash: 741f91455c1fa0bf40fdece116572bad --nextPart3697809.ktX46XAXfx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 31 July 2006 13:01, Christian Andreetta wrote: > Seemant Kulleen wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 23:50 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > >> My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to > >> expect IF I use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official > >> people figure it's gentoo and when it breaks Gentoo suffers. Gentoo h= as > >> a reputation as a good solid, stable distro. As user and big fan of > >> Gentoo I'm concerned - why couldn't sunrise have stayed unoffical like > >> BMG. Why does it have to be official? Gentoo can choose to do what it > >> feels is right and I will do the same. > > It has just to be put clear that in this case "official" doesn't mean > "solid", "right", "tested by our best QA", but simply "preferred". That > is, I think we're not speaking of "official", but "_basically_ revised" > and "encouraged". And that's why it has been announced as the best since sliced bred - urging= =20 all users to give it a try, but with the option to point with the finger on= =20 them, laughing "Ha, ha, you should have known dumb nuts.", later. Brett is= =20 absolutely right with his previous emails. Carsten --nextPart3697809.ktX46XAXfx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEz/XrVwbzmvGLSW8RAssMAJkB8TJqS+U8Stjooa8EI1CJ30souACcDaHs 5EsIZtnAvdr0hGatKexT5c0= =BV29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3697809.ktX46XAXfx-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list