From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G3H7m-0000wy-Dt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:50:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6JInNcO029778; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:49:23 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6JIkxfN011677 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:47:01 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9F964951 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17946 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2006 14:03:12 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2006 14:03:12 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:20:59 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607042154.22942.vapier@gentoo.org> <200607152337.56342.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200607152337.56342.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1633750.5Cp8kfixnt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607191420.59368.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 74497ca7-d35e-4ed6-a0af-0fc00b175063 X-Archives-Hash: 24d94239ec9ba0c33d00a787fdfe9c33 --nextPart1633750.5Cp8kfixnt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 15 July 2006 23:37, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 04 July 2006 21:54, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an "opt-out" system > > rather than "opt-in" ? > > patch attached ... no complaints, i'll merge it in a day or two :p merged -mike --nextPart1633750.5Cp8kfixnt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARL54C0FjO5/oN/WBAQK7KBAAwpQkFx9rhPs/kmv3uGZ7Yib29cYV+/Ae Y6obK66ztNGwK1c+ygatdI/O5EFYrkkIYcNiHqYVI0CZmk1wmS2+eh54eO5aWVdj lKwztObEfXaMfJiZ34+zvsiQejgjM5eLHvIXF2FunM2t89Dz0nNJlvuXGDbRNyet atQoAQnNtABFODnzjNaUAawOErxyBe7vxogQDkXqWzg99Lx+m+OFmYP+qjzwAbfE asEsEJ/C13JZdK3JuxO+XzrsZuSJFnglCt+BmHfWtNgds2YXd7ILIgXw/xNra9OA 3cjtCZjBjvzErX6yyfA3ueIjoazB9wRm+QrNS6CPtVKTAFztzv3adWh8hgeFaXKf ixvdnL1Zi63TNXso3+UN2Jgbb4U6pmgUmnuwe60ANYaEGTZ0iotBMkVXSZiuMd/z outBKzha/aEfKugfCWl0MggwGzXks2yfZ+6IO1Oow8Bc7QYMFPVvfsjorwu1UIvW B/zBa1jYu2mEFXFvIylyp4Ms6ytAd5TOu6DKPgnZUHNk5+/NamUSznND5lfJ01Ut LtFQZv6+TWEgrM7vd6lSGx8oeDMT254ZhVZAYlvarw6Vyw0D7BrUPhSZBE1VJ4+C xDPTnWUKTJRqssb12rLHxp68RPGVm4UDEN1xGW/myCrSEye0XnWY2aBhMhY6tQ5r 21oAmX8PsBI= =UAGb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1633750.5Cp8kfixnt-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list