On Friday 14 July 2006 11:09, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > While it is a "working" solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one.
>
> You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer.
>
> As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until
> portage devs implements the per-package use.mask that i asked WAY before
> 2.1 release, but was then left OUT of the freeze and thus of the featureset
> we can use 6 months from now, I REFUSE to change the behaviour.

/me humps angry over worked flameeyes
-mike