From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fyyhu-0007Lp-Ea for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 22:21:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k67MJCS7014788; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:19:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k67MDA3j015980 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:13:11 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBAB647C1 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11643 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2006 18:00:28 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2006 18:00:28 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:13:27 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200607071712.21536.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060707215313.GA3713@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20060707215313.GA3713@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1537891.UIdO1gJ1kJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607071813.28005.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ef9388d7-fc2b-4c17-ba89-508808e301a1 X-Archives-Hash: 1114ee9e4292e7e8d7d98d4e92f5fd70 --nextPart1537891.UIdO1gJ1kJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 07 July 2006 17:53, Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 05:12:21PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 07 July 2006 01:46, Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 07:44:34PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:14, Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote: > > > > > Gentoo's gcc with the vanilla flag isn't the official GCC. Most > > > > > patches don't get appplied, but some do. Plus, gcc[vanilla] isn't= a > > > > > supported compiler in Gentoo. > > > > > > > > you're just griping because i forced ssp/pie regardless of > > > > USE=3Dvanilla ... > > > > > > I didn't mind that you applied ssp/pie patches regardless of > > > USE=3Dvanilla, I did mind that you applied the stub patches with > > > USE=3D"nossp vanilla", and I also didn't like that this was either do= ne > > > accidentally but ignored when pointed out, or that this was done > > > deliberately with a misleading cvs log message. > > > > it was not ignored, i told you the answer was no ... i listened to your > > request and then i evaluated the situation and deemed at the time to go > > with what we have now. see how your usage of "ignored" is incorrect he= re > > ? > > Actually, you did ignore. The below text refers to something older. ignored *what* then ? you requested USE=3Dvanilla control ssp, i said no a= nd=20 i'll add support for USE=3Dnossp ... you requested USE/stub control, i said= no,=20 go delete the stubs i dont see what else you're referring to ... be specific, vague claims only= =20 lead to wasting of both our times > > > I don't know how much gcc-spec-env.patch can be trusted, and even if = it > > > is 100% safe, such patches don't belong in anything that would be > > > called "vanilla". (I have commented on that patch long before this > > > thread started, so don't think I'm just looking for something to > > > complain about now.) > > > > you never pointed that patch out to me nor did i notice it, so i dont > > really see how you could have expected this to be fixed already > > I didn't point that out to you, I pointed that out to another of the > toolchain guys. I'm not completely sure who, but I think it was > Halcy0n. all bets are off now then ... with Halcy0n leaving us, that leaves me as th= e=20 only person maintaining the toolchain (there are few devs who contribute=20 fixes for their ports and it helps out a ton, but that doesnt really count = as=20 being fully responsible for the toolchain packages). no more making=20 retroactive claims when i wasnt involved ;P i trust azarah to help out, but he's been busy in real life so i havent/won= t=20 ask him to contribute since i know he cannot (even if he wants to) =2Dmike --nextPart1537891.UIdO1gJ1kJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARK7ch0FjO5/oN/WBAQJwmRAAvvhdyKfbhNz6PEZZdWale4pEGoRqXo8n 7A7nrKDediR8dPuPHVxOqUmAQKWHFtcu6xPgcxDaQfE5NcZRuM6WN4VaUcBpB/x6 Ggvk9HwcTez3PkvSmh/fy9dfIDlH3/rgP248QDVl0xtmxtugt+P+/cCiLH3Yd6f/ 0gOUB5Tjcq+4tQ3Dnhu/NiyVpVftMV2sVq3rI/oGWTM/EptEaZVtrz53pBwaE1vn 3cl/fC+aaZcbkJb/rUteG652EMAjCm0Z260RYOYar47m3MLmbBt7N2+UAMJGwFd9 /Zl4XtrNUMJPRj3i3B1KNZriRVMeozX5w/zBtL1ip5Q1u+Mw19gp4LQDf3u3ln9r M1KHPX7ckYicMFrlXtmCf9Q/a+sMsfoij3mQgRHYNT40pZ0MC7AzmyVWncMwmw4l TQtQvxraq+yYEc6MwdydnXruki1EDdYQF/E459x2YKNYD7PH03BxNQn3Pmd8bxq0 blAY7jaJ5BaITsCBV/T3loB5rb62mTE2zeJe+Jpo5H3uslRklwjAHa0HeguUPxIP ugAXjUqW8zWbMTnum4/3a2ntigrJ1z2GJdn7QyZ0VNRL3trF1i0Gdyxb1Ngclvrh S/PaVqtwBp7uZ4yLvzg+IPY/6+7weayZnDVXZVImPf7VmxrM8e2FblV75t0QOSA6 zidid7GkxyQ= =Nkwg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1537891.UIdO1gJ1kJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list