From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FyvIC-0004pV-8O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:43:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k67Ie0bK013603; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:40:00 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k67IYS1d009528 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:34:29 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B16564499 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15034 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2006 14:21:50 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2006 14:21:50 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:34:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <1152286310.9384.60.camel@lycan.lan> <200607071922.40427@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200607071922.40427@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1704804.JTok24X12K"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607071434.45843.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0a08bfd2-8325-4c30-a288-a86ed06a3b05 X-Archives-Hash: 09611c34279f180cbf58b43d37db0f5b --nextPart1704804.JTok24X12K Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 07 July 2006 13:22, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote: > On Friday 07 July 2006 17:31, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > As I pointed out on irc (to clarify), its still an issue even with > > gcc-3.4.6. Its just well enough filtered, and as Mike pointed out, they > > 'fixed' it in 3.4.5 via specs, and 3.4.6 by backporting patches from > > 4.0.1 I think. > > For what I know, the last issue was fixed with 3.3/3.4, so this sounds new > to me. i dont think the segfaults applied to the 3.3 branch as the code was new to= =20 the 3.4 branch the issues were worked around in 3.4.5 via specs filtering, 3.4.6 included = one=20 fix and i backported the other, 3.4.4 and older i dont know the status of=20 (but i'd be inclined to push people to 3.4.6 anyways and cut 3.4.[0-4]) > That said, I think this is up to now the only point that would make me > rethink over this whole idea. For a pure simple and practical problem. doesnt seem like a valid roadblocker to me ... but i see the toolchain as=20 something higher up guys shouldnt have to worry/think about; fix the gcc=20 bugs, dont work around them in ebuilds =2Dmike --nextPart1704804.JTok24X12K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARK6pRUFjO5/oN/WBAQJcGhAA37G5VtJXVHx6HwkXVmaHAtbdGMhoJvWo Yu9JGaCKibqQQEEjtZCU9wfd8wgDsniwouuJjZfi3ZkqTtdZgpj9n/l0TFfEAmH+ H9dRNGWp2lykXoDvVPhf5153r6Dt1ZFkznuR41s4c6sGp+X/3+ElFyKS/lpmVpRK 9oozx9FAxY/A60trQQKNvZV2/2g9cLS8Xaba/GUkY7WN13INez2oHpsK/arDIiT6 UxMOeH6rJKzu6fFQmOM4mZWUmSc2E000vA7NdSUYjRbNBYxxDkllfe9NUttgcQ/a kF5CsPqGCEkKM9rbdENQPSD6/IZZzyB2TjRLXQwLZIMuOo/UBMOBXPimzTgpPhqF caD+CHNr4L4ZjsBF+3xSD5a/4dBXXgaMq7Fx/YfqQTYBK2crmg0ZzQsQEUV+lX31 6e4/ulw7CJ0jQT7AFOoXlIFD/voX/LcWb7/s47pJSNMVCXcozNpNkkVIdmc12KeL vEngNm/MyAq2iWuJc1V7J8hED0o6MSo0RXE1vYCYCcTaBRMWbzgSXyAM3my4SdY0 0akZdCdaM5BvWUjJNdRVTAor2TNbORWzwZmPFmUz8Pac1thcxa7w6pD2sUftFpGf Iuro+6XE0/xZjZUZ/uzo3vEKHE4homb/DXI56YtTmXoZfp1cJ2SwLG+CVtPjwM8W rFP/LNK6kbw= =TASb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1704804.JTok24X12K-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list