From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FycJg-0002KF-Vj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:27:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k66MParb009722; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:25:36 GMT Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k66MK0tx008478 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 22:20:00 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust453.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.6.1.198]:30361 helo=localhost) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1FycCS-0007JZ-TO (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Thu, 06 Jul 2006 23:19:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:28:37 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Message-ID: <20060706232837.7265f7cc@localhost> In-Reply-To: <44AD8A12.8000600@gentoo.org> References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200607062246.31954@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706215856.64d8d6c2@snowdrop.home> <200607062312.51721@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706222339.545302f1@snowdrop.home> <44AD814C.1050508@gentoo.org> <20060706224553.079a9e63@snowdrop.home> <44AD8A12.8000600@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: e2dd8c3c-299c-4548-9bc6-d3022b662cb0 X-Archives-Hash: e50d6e0969869b70b2fab2ee6f0e121a On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:09:22 -0500 "Jory A. Pratt" wrote: > Leaving aside the incoherent ad-hominem attack, could you please point out where the bullshit is? If you were referring to my post, I suggest you re-read Ciaran's first mail to this thread. He outlined at least two possible alternatives, but everyone seems to have ignored this. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list