From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FyaRZ-0003tS-5o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:27:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k66KP4gT001215; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:25:04 GMT Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k66KJEZI013014 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:19:14 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust453.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.6.1.198]:21785 helo=localhost) by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1FyaJZ-0005sl-5f (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:19:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:27:51 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) Message-ID: <20060706212751.163a9b53@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060706205631.4b8ad784@snowdrop.home> References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <44ACF6C9.7010209@gentoo.org> <1152200486.605.35.camel@onyx> <20060706190618.GB3257@gentoo.org> <20060706214220.2f2c6059@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <20060706205631.4b8ad784@snowdrop.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 110bcac2-fe64-4b31-aa0f-cf27442a4411 X-Archives-Hash: d646ab810bb6906f7e59a5594296e481 On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:56:31 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Selective and partial backporting of patches that leads to the C++ > standard library code getting broken? Obviously not an issue. Noone uses C++ anyway. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list