From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fyf57-0002Ix-CC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 01:24:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k671McNc030509; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 01:22:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k671Iq6K032059 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 01:18:52 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C225A646B7 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 01:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26671 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2006 21:06:26 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2006 21:06:26 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:19:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200607062046.10517.vapier@gentoo.org> <200607070257.31496@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> In-Reply-To: <200607070257.31496@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6601893.xgpIJLJlC1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607062119.04625.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 978eeb56-dfa7-4244-bad8-85b9b737cd39 X-Archives-Hash: 3c608f2742b4d31b53e4a3ea62959ed9 --nextPart6601893.xgpIJLJlC1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 06 July 2006 20:57, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote: > I'm just saying that I wouldn't discard entirely a solution just because > some unsupported software _might_ not work (note the conditional). I > wouldn't discard a solution just because it _might_ not work on > GNU/kFreeBSD; I would discard it if I _know for sure_ that it does not wo= rk > on GNU/kFreeBSD (in which case, knowing it doesn't work, I would look for= a > working solution). you missed the point of my reply ... flatly discarding anything because we= =20 dont currently support it is a bad place to be what i was implying wasnt for you to discard an entire solution, just be mo= re=20 flexible forward thinking is what has allowed Gentoo to be trivially ported to what = was=20 once considered unsupported (i know it's helped a ton in porting to obscure= =20 cpus :P) now, put that in your pipe and smoke it =2Dmike --nextPart6601893.xgpIJLJlC1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARK22iEFjO5/oN/WBAQIJnQ/9FbSzmwL15xSLYBF2XfppIQvB0x/99pYR /RQFGdkp0cLwwIK5Z2OKF5Fz/B+qgIb0bl/LqT4bkEKCdehcFt6DYfzeBHgJvi4X x9ErNjOhFohsam49BUb7YblRBPjFw5Q7enF4NSvH/84ormDGK9zR+RjQYpUvgd7V Jk72SO8rc9NRbG6C9kxQ/ww9C9TQP8VeLEc15pLBStEXyh38UOncofJJ9QAywJ7a YSdf896FTZoRVpiIgerDg676EJGOn68+9yYZVgrpG47hPdRLGDDW1lP31CAtLI8q JoGxXIxU/lbIlQJudS8Is47UsZPiggn14ZM7XT0KqmWRAe64xIBYYENw8jtbJl3X s41NwfLdGKJN2LZXeK53af0rsnJbXQwHgR4tPv+G0RsWpW9rLjEku5P0FDAyHMw1 oQptF0sNcHPrZmjz2+1QDANMyX28IVuTjmXC2DqWTtY0z4BwFl+TV5b8Qcl/gR+0 e0v/Av4LNu/Zq0gle3eQtOXhD450DMG4rYf1xZt5RTGj31EwkKgdBnZ20H5Hxi0n y8KOe5iGZTRcLD79QIfIAiy3RF2Gd9JIOngwkNDVaHpLOSf/ZvOFXeeiL5k7N7yN pFDS5rcs6F3NWT+Ilf6NsiFkoK4RCc5PPVoh8FqnIIWI+SFU5CVAtfqchB0OxkZC MVwGhGhfGZY= =WhSz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6601893.xgpIJLJlC1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list