From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fyeco-0002EB-JO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:55:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k670rmNo007255; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 00:53:48 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k670nnac021270 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 00:49:50 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1564327 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 00:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2006 20:37:26 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2006 20:37:26 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:50:03 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706134939.6ecd7758@snowdrop.home> <44AD1843.1090707@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44AD1843.1090707@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1236987.vtOX7reG2Q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607062050.03899.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b8fb009b-8ebd-4dc5-8500-48513a4f24ce X-Archives-Hash: e174a173602d31ecf05ab822b395e3d6 --nextPart1236987.vtOX7reG2Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:03, Simon Stelling wrote: > c) This is not about "regaining" control. Currently, users who want to > cross-compile are screwed and need nasty use.mask-hacks to not end up > with broken binaries. The inability to provide per-package CFLAGS is a > missing feature in portage, it's got nothing to do with this issue. deficiency in portage that is being slowly resolved ... this is hardly=20 specific to cpu-based USE flags and deserves nothing short of a real fix on= =20 the portage side as for "broken binaries", i kind of doubt that statement ... when was the l= ast=20 time you saw a cross-toolchain accept assembly code written for a different= =20 architecture ? now if you had said broken builds, i would have agreed with= =20 you slightly ... but again, refer to the "this is hardly specific to=20 cpu-based USE flags" statement from earlier =2Dmike --nextPart1236987.vtOX7reG2Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARK2vu0FjO5/oN/WBAQJ7bw/+KU2b8PAj36NDxKuC5x2R2yX6Dz8bDzmo Dy/LTRw+q9Bo8wo/uCP9YgRqVpaVhisT5f3sdr/pQqZACPEpFhnj7ZDUN/okBYJ5 X1LpVKJWVCnyDJ+RtGLE3SfMGKfwCtPTBtbBj43ErzcI7gAmSSEuBBDpsxD57eLA LCBuEoCn6FkFxsu9/KH5cKySSEkN+FbpFfOfhCzvFf/gEcYBuMXpctaMnTj+CAb2 lFCei/UqNtj7Ocx5zpjGbdl4wf6LoOOmysoA4v7wXK2R80+KmKa3MiGioQl/Ll6m ZvTxYbJunrO39aSBxyFlF4JHekxXV5hV23tTu8WrZCe0F0regGM/EYAOSeSYPBf7 mTMi1C0u3UrK/yqXqBcn4R40yNKcYpTc01LyOwE37nd3H5k+VfF6ieVaidx6Gt+C XAtoxrRukRKk6wJbdE90C03JKtzHzJHSbn8Ey9nPMbhwLZPMxNwH0BflXz9dXUWl +6TrMfFxPecClY/ejgG/H7kQdqT8z4PVSjaUVnOxW+GnyhlXjign5y2I+5enpCkn ySNjVlZK0tpdzBK7K+kF0KW+myFu/wKgyCWegrfZKbIkLLInu6IbR7hVweeG+ZLI 6+TgtCulh7A6xbTEgwS6km5k/MlmaWqhoUMe7wVvC+8haLZYmGFXIJTdOU2u43sc gFhRgAe0oJ4= =vx9q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1236987.vtOX7reG2Q-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list