public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_nofetch: $A vs. $SRC_URI
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:08:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060704200855.GA3637@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44AAC2E8.8060408@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:35:04PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > When FEATURES=mirror, and you try to fetch, it does indeed contain unevaluated
> > USE flags. However for FEATURES=-mirror, the content of it is correct - no USE
> > flags at all.
> Are you sure about the SRC_URI being different?  I don't see anything
> in the code that causes the SRC_URI to change depending on FEATURES,
> and a quick test doesn't seem to reproduce that behavior.
Sorry, you're right, my earlier testcase had a bug that caused me to
miss it.

> If a version of SRC_URI that has all the conditionals evaluated is
> needed in the ebuild environment, then I think we should use a new
> variable name.  Otherwise, it's ambiguous.
Sure, I don't object to to a new variable.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-04 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-04  1:00 [gentoo-dev] pkg_nofetch: $A vs. $SRC_URI Robin H. Johnson
2006-07-04  2:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-04  2:36   ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-07-04 18:59     ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-04 19:35     ` Zac Medico
2006-07-04 20:08       ` Robin H. Johnson [this message]
2006-07-05  9:29       ` Marius Mauch
2006-07-05 18:10         ` Zac Medico
2006-07-05 17:48           ` Marius Mauch
2006-07-04 18:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-07-04 19:32   ` Mike Frysinger
2006-07-04 20:10     ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-07-04 20:56       ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060704200855.GA3637@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net \
    --to=robbat2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox