From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fx7c8-0005ik-IV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:28:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k62JPaKQ009025; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:25:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k62JKkYD018365 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:20:46 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B075644C4 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25999 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2006 15:09:42 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2006 15:09:42 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:26:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Chris Gianelloni References: <20060701112900.76A1A647BA@smtp.gentoo.org> <1151849441.9102.14.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1151849441.9102.14.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2935980.NvRyzvHExc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607021526.37026.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5499b1ca-59f2-4fc4-88fe-4f9f646df746 X-Archives-Hash: 3c97f6538a3e9a5c0b9d206afb17ae8e --nextPart2935980.NvRyzvHExc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 02 July 2006 10:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 19:23 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > > Can we have another Sunrise discussion please? I would love to have some > > feedback about Sunrise, about our progress and where we are still > > lacking. > > What exactly is there to "discuss" about this? the answer to this is really quite obvious > What has the existence of Sunrise done for Gentoo? What new packages > are now in the tree because of it? What new developers have been > recruited because of it? What packages that were previously without > maintainers in the tree have found maintainers due to Sunrise? why do any of these matter at this point of time ? you cant kill a project= =20 for failing to accomplish any of its goals when it hasnt been given real ti= me=20 yet to actually accomplish them =2Dmike --nextPart2935980.NvRyzvHExc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARKgd7EFjO5/oN/WBAQJKUBAAv6RrisH/Mp0kqRy/uKdE3pp8ONeeEduq OMD196eV6HvYnsk9awt1XBl9dyEsaFncMXmZlWYbL2S4vDnP7ngd3YxfrMTvBTRh 5IhpZhWg/lBwARX8TLBCsQn3lPhkyx4Hn1ifrtWMi1jQr/7exBJcww7+nbn5tm12 A+lhCzR3yDcqnnmAoN/Ky+8XI+d4U5uMON9qmpKo4YnqENJuptkl87jJR1EBsO+J gx2NBW+J+3VdvDzmuUiWcCLTo4LdQ30JBHrx5QKzM2JVzrglVNvq9BnliTXiB0av ZkUhVDiyhtgorDFuJffAJgIJSAprAMgNh4Sd+ABxb+JCZNbs8LSJcC9g0VCN16LA 0Z/+3TIeTooT4iY0Kt4KXgb1foOvZcqSHuK5LpUbBrzCIUXfuBHWcxyzcu0vGiEL ZTjgqgQXupOKbmqrOztX4TWa7tcyVOQQNYrATfYV//UKr1LbckKkFCJBf/lv5rpM AMv2Jm6XnNL1WG2UCT90qVIIkWlWnnJRDDcdtNSwUZ6ilOv5UbEq0wXEqp943hAK 7kiYa5Pgly4YdXQdcODoSiPTx/NR0ae/fjqEBe9vc7Te/47OPMp+vLL3c+ey03Ni PEjmOvy92C1/KrLYNiKaYvPs85v+SW9RQoyQL9MGbuecCG2sxyBx8ukYVfgfFdpP F/w2jhysqeI= =Zj/l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2935980.NvRyzvHExc-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list