From: George Shapovalov <george@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 12:29:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607011229.25738.george@gentoo.org> (raw)
Hi gang
It looks like we got all the coments we could get, so lets get done with it
then. What's left is minor legwork that is best done by the maintainers of
the individual herds, here is the approximate list:
Herds:
0. If you feel you did not polish up the idea of a particular herd or category
enough and you have not created a bug for it (blocking #138049, the tracker)
I suggest you finally do it - it will become much more apparent then what to
do..
0.5 Decide on the herd name.
1. Edit gentoo/misc/herds.xml and add the entry for the corresponding herd,
listing developers who ended up maintaining it.
2. Adjust metatdata.xml files for the packages that should belong to it (the
ones in the corresponding category are of course prime candidates, but dont
forget to check sci-libs as well and check if there any others outside that
you are aware of).
3. Create an alias for this new herd. It is probably best if the alias matches
the name of the herd - bugwranglers will have no problem assigning the bugs
then..
The aliases are on dev.g.o under /var/mail/alias (your dev login will allow
you to access/modify them) and I would encourage the maintainers of these
herds to create these aliases, so that you have more controll over your mails
and I do not screw up (and not end up with people asking me for a trivial
modifications many month aft the reorg :)).
Caterogies:
Looks like right now only sci-crystallography could make sense, as there are
enough people and packages behind it.
sci-proof - saw some activity but I understand that most of the proposed
packages are not in the tree yet. May start as a herd and transition to the
category when enough packages go in..
sci-physics - many packages were listed, so a candidate, but I did not get a
clear impression of how "finalized" the idea was and how many people finally
decided to stay behind it.
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-01 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-01 10:29 George Shapovalov [this message]
2006-07-01 11:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving Luis Medinas
2006-07-01 11:27 ` George Shapovalov
2006-07-01 20:03 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-01 13:16 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-science] " George Shapovalov
2006-07-01 14:56 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-science] Scientific Gentoo reorg: on herd naming George Shapovalov
2006-07-01 20:07 ` Donnie Berkholz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-01 17:06 [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving Alexandre Buisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607011229.25738.george@gentoo.org \
--to=george@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox