From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FvYFI-0006Ff-Ed for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5SBSUHW018132; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:28:30 GMT Received: from MIUMMR0MT05.um.ced.h3g.it ([62.13.171.111]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5SBOHY5004989 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:24:17 GMT Received: from c1358217.kevquinn.com (miumgu0vp03.um.ced.h3g.it [10.216.57.163]) by MIUMMR0MT05.um.ced.h3g.it (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id AOZ73103; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:24:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:33:32 +0200 From: "Kevin F. Quinn" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing Message-ID: <20060628133332.1033f464@c1358217.kevquinn.com> In-Reply-To: <44A24A29.2080402@alpha.spugium.net> References: <44A24A29.2080402@alpha.spugium.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_O6.zXn/JCVB_SOnHm5uQXYH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ebfdef51-4378-428c-8a44-4e2f4ba6aaf0 X-Archives-Hash: 30f5f926a158b7ce66a70178e1e61810 --Sig_O6.zXn/JCVB_SOnHm5uQXYH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:21:45 +0200 Mivz wrote: > Does this obligation, to provide your own source, also count for a > none Gentoo developer making a overlay tree for one of his projects > which is licensed under de GPL-2? If your project is licensed under the GPL-2, you have to honour the provisions of that license. You can't license something under the GPL and not provide the source. If you're distributing binary packages, you need to distribute also the source code that went to make up those binary packages (i.e. your changes/additions and also both upstream sources). If you're only distributing source code (e.g. ebuild scripts, patch files) then there's nothing further you need to do. > Would that mean that, if u write software using the portage system, > that every package that is used by one of your own should be > available from a server of your own? You need to provide the source for all binaries you distribute. > If, the developer should also provide it's own file server with all > those packages, this would cause that every developer that wanted to > make a overlay should be a Gentoo file mirror? Only if they distribute binaries, in which case source should be provided sufficient to build those binaries. > Do my senses run wilde? Your just my imagination? > Do I understand this right? If you're not sure whether something you do is compliant with the relevant licenses, talk to an appropriate lawyer. --=20 Kevin F. Quinn --Sig_O6.zXn/JCVB_SOnHm5uQXYH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEomkR9G2S8dekcG0RArIlAJ4jgMNrMIXQLaE+ZbqKF4ygdIlTRQCeOH1g w+EmhUudnYQbGYsUnpNL7qw= =FBLS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_O6.zXn/JCVB_SOnHm5uQXYH-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list