From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FvNqI-0000mv-P1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:23:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5S0LciE016591; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:21:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5S0F5xg012030 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:15:05 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B338264DA6 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18758 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2006 20:05:36 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2006 20:05:36 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.1.1 testing/stablization and glibc 2.4 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:20:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1151445376.16111.28.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <44A1B1E8.4020202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44A1B1E8.4020202@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2434587.HXTEinBFBW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606272020.35407.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7993110a-fe43-499c-99fd-c76ef40e5085 X-Archives-Hash: 67dbd2757f1dac496267a844cdbfa2a2 --nextPart2434587.HXTEinBFBW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 27 June 2006 18:32, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of > > getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build > > some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with > > it. What we really need is for more people to test this on various > > platforms and to get all of the bugs worked out that we can. We're > > already ramping up our release cycle, and would like to get this > > included, so we don't have to wait until 2007 for a release with >= GCC > > 4.1 in it. > > That would be really cool. I'm already been testing both this and the > glibc on the ~1500 packages installed on my x86, plus the Pegasos ppc > and iBook I've got around. I'll do the same on sparc as soon as it shows > up in ~arch there. the trouble is we need these packages in arch now, not ~arch :) -mike --nextPart2434587.HXTEinBFBW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARKHLU0FjO5/oN/WBAQI19Q/+ON4BEuM7LOj9+tuCg6gR8fYQE0rGbad1 O1qoxGotzupbnnyi1DxMZEIAiPtulMs66u3Tf80RtJYIXKmF/BDahlDKxIpZatDf H3LMLku/1u12W6ER80FFs266XgVSO5ESr0Hcz8WNIzQTlJrCEd6fb9MLb0d030OH 4pDZ3LkzlpnHjH3Wbtc6ejLFxkYz9fbdoGjdHK6+wrPNkl+HAMt1H98pYmIjRjS7 ejf50L+ywQtkDdZxa5gaIsNatFV7oY+dVExftID3MwdnJqV4DhfBbxD1F+pNovUL vshtDbP0na5+viWFdIOzNEpnB1oEKmeXnsTUeYejboQUpysPpq9JTvb0j9wme9Hp BWXboTImW2M840+E4Y7/ENyaryNV+DY+88UNAW4C++Obb6Shi51unSa/HFnMFJP9 sVcn2NwLmO13JjnFrEtOnPmadD9B4KEoKMoysZ0wkdBwdwIAnsF3GBOPNOauvfnZ pMR9aKeB7BBJNqJtRZA5hpYGBYFYaIuIWm1/7BVdGYZHtrgXddHXNSjO/CUzBod3 QJ4ifhVZkSftztCPzUVkXUd8MPEj6wEL/IUWAhNJ/Q3WIz9YjjrKuHtNCCuHvP6e ao+uaY69JEuHAFBNyQDiEhwPQkADH02EZt+sqnLdKzICdFVgR5iPGfpQ/rHS+Y7g 0Aa7YBrTY5o= =amwo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2434587.HXTEinBFBW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list