From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ft5bX-00018F-KU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:31:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5LGTrPe015934; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:29:53 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5LGRGDX022486 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:27:17 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (c137220.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.137.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881906413D for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:20:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:20:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200606210921.27405.caleb@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6298382.XW6IzEImUy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606211720.56203.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: d473b586-2689-4f53-94fb-3c45224517da X-Archives-Hash: 10b95b0ff721f83f57a85bda305a01ea --nextPart6298382.XW6IzEImUy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > qt3 and qt4 is being used there already and it is obvious It's "nice" to invent new use flags affecting Qt stuff without contacting=20 those who care for Qt. > > > 2) A package requires either Qt3 or Qt4 (both not both?...such as > > x11-libs/qwt-5). > > qt3 - enable optional qt3 support > qt4 - enable optional qt4 support That will be a mess to support in the long run. Let's go with that what wor= ks=20 better, prefer the latest version and be fine with it. I do agree with Cale= b=20 to use the qt use flag for the latest supported version and in cases it is= =20 really necessary to have an additional qt3 use flag. Carsten --nextPart6298382.XW6IzEImUy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEmWPYVwbzmvGLSW8RAnlgAKCviITF+OrfLR5tAmO/JxUYEReKVgCggr5I OyYTcAC8jLzbduqg5bCidCA= =pjVp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6298382.XW6IzEImUy-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list