From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Foq8n-0007v2-Uv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:11:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59N9Bhi027232; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:09:11 GMT Received: from ns2.pil.dk (ns2.pil.dk [195.41.47.38]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59N3kfp011601 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:03:46 GMT Received: from osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (83.72.33.139.ip.tele2adsl.dk [83.72.33.139]) by ns2.pil.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DE37BA749 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B79667732C; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:03:44 +0200 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] client/server policy for ebuilds Message-ID: <20060609230343.GD5885@osgiliath> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1149885352.22473.157.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1149891593.5521.53.camel@onyx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1149891593.5521.53.camel@onyx> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: a5ffb0c1-55fb-40aa-89bd-30ce194331b8 X-Archives-Hash: 5b46e2faa0884349190af04e1c91923a --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:53PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > Seems logical. >=20 > But for what you are proposing I'd suggest not making USE of minimal at > all for this. I'd rather see that flag reserved for mostly=20 > embedded alike use. Me too. A server/client set of USE flags seems more appropriate to me. Sincerely, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFEif5Pv+Q4flTiePgRAkCFAJ9WMi1LWt9YsFVh9yLyxfJwyMWmbgCeOhJE ca5+KTz7gzy7U4BQfnGsVO4= =qKX6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list