From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FojFE-0001PY-DI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:49:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59Fk5Eq025662; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:46:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59FdvXx005416 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:39:57 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (c190020.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.190.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D466567A for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:39:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Project Sunrise - =?windows-1252?q?Gentoo=09User=09Overlay?= Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:39:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060609110801.GD29635@osgiliath> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9133537.mWD7zYgZvN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606091739.53818.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a488986d-b3bb-4c77-a765-595ff4e3a28f X-Archives-Hash: 0bc88729d601f6d67f4d69a815d2fdcb --nextPart9133537.mWD7zYgZvN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 09 June 2006 13:44, Peter wrote: > Secondly, my bias against a third party repository is perhaps unwarranted. > I am sure the bmg site is excellent and the people running it are > well-intentioned and experienced. However, that said, as a user, I have a > higher comfort level staying in the gentoo.realm. It's not. The problem is, that the assumption an overlays.g.o overlay of th= e=20 sort we speak about would be better, is false. Carsten --nextPart9133537.mWD7zYgZvN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEiZZJVwbzmvGLSW8RAnvuAJ49WuM1UhwHBdAQRSHv0v++fnlScQCgr6r9 oagk/VWusJmFoVPG8fWjNYU= =HfO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9133537.mWD7zYgZvN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list