From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FofFz-00086i-RD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:34:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59BVxle031653; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:31:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59BRWWd022144 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:27:33 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (c190020.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.190.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C97265556 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:27:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Project Sunrise - Gentoo User Overlay Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:27:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <4488CDF4.1060009@gentoo.org> <623652d50606090312i64dbe70atb8ae0ad215a069ea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <623652d50606090312i64dbe70atb8ae0ad215a069ea@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7992690.ni617u8W14"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606091327.28458.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c8712977-1809-4f1f-b67f-453a051b93a3 X-Archives-Hash: b7d1b9be91a0bc6ab0106647affb3e21 --nextPart7992690.ni617u8W14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 09 June 2006 12:12, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > This larger group of users are the ones that would benefit > from an overlay. And this larger group of people is exactly the same one, that doesn't know = to=20 help itself, if necessary and will suffer the most, when something goes=20 wrong. This group of people shouldn't use any overlay. I think the basic misconception is that some think we are supposed to provi= de=20 a package just because it's requested. We need maintainers for every packag= e.=20 Without maintainers: Sorry, no. Period. Carsten --nextPart7992690.ni617u8W14 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEiVsgVwbzmvGLSW8RAkdhAKCcnLfJsZuH2zDrpgvxyfi5IYwZHQCgobG1 4O2nLcf2piCvUN35WLeCxWE= =Nrva -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7992690.ni617u8W14-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list