From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FoS05-0007ze-SD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:25:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58LOBpL030546; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:24:11 GMT Received: from ns2.pil.dk (ns2.pil.dk [195.41.47.38]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k58LLY1R014039 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:21:34 GMT Received: from osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (83.72.33.139.ip.tele2adsl.dk [83.72.33.139]) by ns2.pil.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67C37BA87C for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:21:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F360656765; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:21:32 +0200 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification Message-ID: <20060608212132.GF6526@osgiliath> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <44887368.9030302@gentoo.org> <20060608192004.GC6526@osgiliath> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 8b3f8185-7b50-4c42-810b-854f0f7bc538 X-Archives-Hash: 88fc8d9177bad2ed7fb3920e4060dcc7 --mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:05:38PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: > On 6/8/06, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > >Will you also review the code each and every ebuild pull down over the > >internet? >=20 > The policy for overlays.gentoo.org hosting [1] is hopefully clear: as > the project leads, they're ultimately responsible (and therefore > accountable) for what goes into their project overlay - no matter > whether it's committed by a dev or by a user who has been entrusted > with commit rights to the overlay. [snip] I don't really see how this answers my question, but I do appreciate the summary of the policy for overlays.g.o. I have no problems with the overlay project in general - my concern is about the Sunshine project. > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/policy.xml While reading the policy above, I stumbled across this line: "Bug Tracking: bugs.g.o is the OneTrueBugTrackingSystem(tm), even for overlays." Could you please elaborate on this? Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFEiJTcv+Q4flTiePgRAsD4AJwJ8NwXQG8pgR6FKNTzLO37yCQH6ACgrEXl OJwPEFZ+nvlbUbQqHANmnAY= =AVus -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list