From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FoHUC-0005OG-KL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:11:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58A8V9G022677; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:08:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k58A3ZLs004715 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:03:35 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161B96511D for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28623 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 06:00:24 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 06:00:24 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:07:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060607151325.GA27076@nightcrawler> <1149717321.25264.4.camel@localhost> <44875D48.3030203@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44875D48.3030203@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3417988.HVlZEzkfbt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606080607.29659.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cd86aa50-471f-4126-9bd9-3d41bbd7d6a7 X-Archives-Hash: 6ab1634c0373cc76e4a9a4645edfe0c5 --nextPart3417988.HVlZEzkfbt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:12, Alec Warner wrote: > I would be more concerned with convincing the rest of the developers. > adding crap in base profile.bashrc will affect 99% of users, so it > better be friggin correct and useful, otherwise you will piss a ton of > people off. versus the people who are really annoyed that such support hasnt yet been=20 integrated into portage proper ? yes, from the portage side of things, it may be a pita to implement=20 per-package env ... but from the user side of things, it's a huge help =2Dmike --nextPart3417988.HVlZEzkfbt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARIf24UFjO5/oN/WBAQL7Kw//cRxWCyEQd/nqnrjPkCj0OuuT5J7Oycq5 71DfZ+C8UwCvanSsJHf7ljUzetzwvDAzwgAh3Gh6fwZGxTG/tTEqkjBjdyQkKJk6 86jChFHXGaB6EfBV14IrASdii1Xj2joR2sf6YpP7lKtMh2tDEFQcMyj+QWy7RWPW 7Hvf5J9v6VMseuFgzUNYO74RXN3sIwhlqeGfDtngXDl8yZp4GXGVlknKkDDEcM5e oVo/fRDFa5IP4HrH834FtyTRwcI4BfSgM/WEDn/VugSTeVAhImHDN+YIUIv0vdRm F8vgLFkfUAgoAv7l7fJydowLXxWjx9N4BbBlKNCkkYc6KShCLIpcwtoFJIKdOF2o W+uQ1K4RcGGpws9nB0af10upv8+6sCdetg0s3dYv4aZ8n0NBmLSTDHkrApmHDfcC a1C/c+I8V4kZLnqmeegsslg/dO5ymF7TJI9mXcKRMyjkGUDIc4no9op1TS/PsRO/ WFpEoG72JZ4H8VyjLQSaynTzmJ+D9vxV/y9v+4G7Wvy8ZLXH+Cq7/1DtsDxAZDlU eXXmCOGxm5SjTGiaF38WI+Egas0JdStF9DcwEc7i0E7NCqQ1dT0BbV1QhkPgwqu5 zL+XRSZ+8nHLFXGUD20tQqm47HGFR0NZJZSa2vHEUfPjysNTqxpdzSoCpbaRBh5P Z2Hpy8D0j9w= =6RQ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3417988.HVlZEzkfbt-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list