From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FnSkV-0001wo-6O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:00:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k563wcDF032368; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:58:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k563su1D032096 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:54:56 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F012C64709 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5371 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 23:52:28 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 23:52:28 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Default useflag cleanups: -apm -foomaticdb -fortran -imlib -motif -oss -xmms Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:58:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <448458DA.3070405@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <448458DA.3070405@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1452954.Dq3FLFyNE0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606052358.40018.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e6c6595c-e854-431e-87ca-ee9f6f865eb6 X-Archives-Hash: 6ea85c0d7eafeb3068ad358d2eeb21d6 --nextPart1452954.Dq3FLFyNE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 05 June 2006 12:16, Patrick McLean wrote: > Stefan Schweizer wrote: > > -fortran - Do we really need this outdated language as a default in gcc? > > I am not on the toolchain team, but I _think_ the reason this is on by > default is because fortran is considered part of a standard gcc > installation (by upstream, etc). pretty much ... fortran is expected to be part of the default build thus it is i personally disable fortran on all my machines though ;) -mike --nextPart1452954.Dq3FLFyNE0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARIT9b0FjO5/oN/WBAQJY2BAAo+q5k+6tZNrQgH+7UasM+AAZ3jK4QRth 5rvK/bY70qDwUsy1LyfZZYDqRctSkZUmNei+m36L+bvp0zC9tMxoDiJKKRCk65+D yxmUKIosvCS/Bsp+QQ5jSPNPeCgy5hCVbmmVTEfTDdDRQNHPpaIJcrdZNzMZitkb x6gBgvIF/N8jNLK9N4CJOf5ah9fo+vX4Cl/ULJbjHr2iRQC3uMh5E7WtEnqg8ZRt g9HGx4fq9Ek2Nz38KVqK09IWG5gBCAaqnqtO5qWldY135J+9TYutA03f1hKVdtLF tSfy7tEUjQFs+Wd5zMirF7igfuCoRpGe7MG0Z+RATcrNzpCK+gvv3A1i7g1B7be/ LUObbuJ/IFfNM6QQbmX0cTJB1cCM12HO+5KHKFw+PKvqkDzJ3oUgZULH2DhzJ5XT WVIa8vsrX8unv+4CyP08jxxdt3wkYRFbIUU1AquuNIWOMz+gxRwc97fVbpWlZ0pL ZsrM3qxYhqX/xAFxD7DOOB+iONdTCKRew32DvK6amqHxVyVNviPodF+dXhKhKone 1o+6+v7R4Uk3Qds+jqOgGfaMpXgiXfB7If1bVA9q/nzvSmt63TV/MtswhTNVgSy3 lFrNtUHU4iatUrJAx7or80Zu5atKYhxdLgO3hGeT7UbMBYOKP63s/GcuecYyvfNS rsHSP28bKRc= =HRgb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1452954.Dq3FLFyNE0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list