From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fm4qP-00033G-RF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:17:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k528FbXN022862; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:15:37 GMT Received: from smtp50.wxs.nl (smtp50-real.wxs.nl [195.121.247.15]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k528Adpr009314 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:10:39 GMT Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (ip5457f303.direct-adsl.nl [84.87.243.3]) by smtp50.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k528AdNf029287 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:10:39 +0200 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:11:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060601145923.16A4F64651@smtp.gentoo.org> <20060601223301.GB19388@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20060601223301.GB19388@aerie.halcy0n.com> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1375769.OEan0D68Rk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606021011.00418.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 459d7326-cb30-4b5e-a9f1-a32fc1d51b32 X-Archives-Hash: 120dc75ee0f08cb67c0dcd36a2e5fdd2 --nextPart1375769.OEan0D68Rk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 02 June 2006 00:33, Mark Loeser wrote: > Mike Frysinger said: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > > Gentoo dev list to see. > > As I requested in an earlier email, I would like it to be discussed how > we want to handle alternative package managers. The GLEPs both touch on > the issue, but if neither of those proposals are liked, then we are > still left not knowing what to do. > > Here is my original email: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38231 > > As I said in my email, I want there to be a discussion (and hopefully a > decision) as to whether or not adding these packages to *our* tree is > best for us and our users. In my opinion, it seems to make the most > sense for alternative package managers to be hosted on their own > infrastructure so they are free to introduce new features and write > ebuilds to take advantage of those features. > > If it is required for me to be present at the meeting to discuss this (I > don't believe I have to be), then could whoever does the scheduling get > in touch with me, because it will be difficult for me to be here during > the day since I just started a new job. I support this request, and in return am willing to incorporate suggestions= by=20 the council into my GLEP. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1375769.OEan0D68Rk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEf/KUbKx5DBjWFdsRAlLsAJ4y3dDepfAAT6VhXL1GfmGT1ukXCACg1PY9 ovpXYhPnoh9mIWQS75s7D/U= =YhR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1375769.OEan0D68Rk-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list