From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FjcGw-0005UD-20 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 13:22:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4QDL5tg004284; Fri, 26 May 2006 13:21:05 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4QDGxf7017892 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 13:16:59 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h2so58078nfe for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=LWGOCAL+41VhE2SeniOs0eCjwnWRnUGtx7TupbHNf0rgbp1TG82w/VCe5JsuLZTQc6P9SNLpOqRONUxo/jJoquJKR3fRJYHvIkjTIW/Iw2plxsztdAK51OS1HMAD1IgcRG4VxkVuNa2p8zecU8XPyTz5fLoSkRol+1xlQqEv5F0= Received: by 10.49.7.2 with SMTP id k2mr191971nfi; Fri, 26 May 2006 06:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.74.154]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id o9sm497761nfa.2006.05.26.06.16.26; Fri, 26 May 2006 06:16:26 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Future of tetex Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:16:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4476E035.3080207@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4476E035.3080207@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1946077.C5zfyX6jyZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605261516.19248@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: ee4fc915-7831-41c9-a969-e3f351335117 X-Archives-Hash: 1a2e0fd1c18d2cb40ed5a5cf02d810e5 --nextPart1946077.C5zfyX6jyZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 26 May 2006 13:02, Martin Ehmsen wrote: > We are currently considering using the same approach as with the=20 > perl packages (using new-style virtuals), but I guess thats on hold until > it is okay to introduce additional new-style virtuals? As long as the name does not clash with the name of the package (perl prefi= xes=20 the names with "perl-") you are fine, so if you=20 have "virtual/tex-latex-beamer" you should be fine :) I would support this approach btw, especially if you're going with a split = way=20 to add TeX sources, as seems more finegrained :) > Comments, suggestions, offers of help, anything would be useful :) Count on me for testing, and for ~amd64 and ~x86-fbsd marking when needed ;) =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1946077.C5zfyX6jyZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEdv+je2h1+2mHVWMRAsWHAJ96IOllCUmbYE2bgGinn/0zC+GykgCdGZxQ mCSv8i3f7wGVT/hQ861FiIM= =IGCj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1946077.C5zfyX6jyZ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list