From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FjOqH-0008Ir-Cz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 23:02:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4PMxxur014286; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:59:59 GMT Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4PMsNKd017468 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:54:24 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.143] (helo=anti-virus02-10) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FjOim-0006GT-3J for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 23:54:24 +0100 Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1FjOiW-0007yW-F2 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 23:54:08 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:53:33 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Devmanual Message-ID: <20060525235333.721dbfb3@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060525193757.GA12189@dst.grantgoodyear.org> References: <20060524194800.GA24221@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060525104033.GB6773@peter.avira.local> <20060525173956.GB18563@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060525193757.GA12189@dst.grantgoodyear.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1b8e0723-865b-43a8-9a86-e10e8845a13a X-Archives-Hash: 7f6939c7a6e27ed936bf55173f1708a5 On Thu, 25 May 2006 14:37:57 -0500 Grant Goodyear wrote: | That said, I would certainly agree that a long list of authors, with | one author per line, down the center of the page would, indeed, not | look so good. A simple set of names (with links to the contributors | page which provides additional detail, perhaps) would suffice, I'd | think: | Seem reasonable? That sounds good to me. It'd certainly be more in line with the level of credit (you know, that thing that's used in place of paying people or plying them with copious amounts of booze) that was originally given to contributors. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list