From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-13030-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1FiVGS-0004J7-IW
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 11:41:29 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4NBej3k028728;
Tue, 23 May 2006 11:40:45 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4NBZq1K002768
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 May 2006 11:35:52 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so600558nfb
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 May 2006 04:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender;
b=EEz5ikyK/FpLMCQ+JMQocfkH7zIHsPx9FWIQL9no+Mtq9Yrf3RKTM6G8gX/UdEMCt8Lfo1rOlyZvObeCnxnBrLZIC588INyqyPMeFmDfQKfK6B4P9ocXGDmxwXe5Da1GLPH04xxfDarMhLVnkMEO/e1+JAJ09sNk8blYjQPdMjQ=
Received: by 10.49.71.16 with SMTP id y16mr4657272nfk;
Tue, 23 May 2006 04:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.74.154])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id l27sm6229227nfa.2006.05.23.04.35.51;
Tue, 23 May 2006 04:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving virtual/eject to new-style virtual
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:35:49 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200605231238.56089@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060523112539.GA5873@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060523112539.GA5873@gentoo.org>
X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z<D)?o\/2TO|,=?utf-8?q?j=5EzC=3AoDSA=24++z3eixq-H=5E=0A=09+g?=<5?pNbV&a1{sZc=}l\wjrMam[JwcgZ%q{M%k~zJ!;#BCjK.n9y`>?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1290811.8nqGWzFPyj";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200605231335.49738@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: f5be8dc7-e0e3-4787-a6cd-370c980f0d1b
X-Archives-Hash: c64c7f8fd94b667e98288f5e062c502a
--nextPart1290811.8nqGWzFPyj
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 13:25, Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote:
> How does it help? New-style virtuals have several disadvantages, and the
> usual advantages of new-style virtuals don't apply here. If it actually
> provides real benefits, then no objections from me, but how is this
> easier to maintain than a "virtual/eject sys-block/unieject" entry in
> the default-bsd profile?
I should have explained what my whole plan was, probably :)
Currently there are things provided by sys-apps/eject that are not availabl=
e=20
on either unieject or eject-bsd.. the final idea was, from my part, to=20
identify those features in three versions "0a 0b 0c" (the 0 version is to=20
avoid collisions between virtual/eject and sys-apps/eject binpks).
0a would be simply the basic eject command, what it is now.
0b would be basic eject + --trayclose (needed by rip for instance)
0c would be ability to eject usb/scsi devices.
The first case is the dependency as it is now, the second is eject or=20
unieject, the third would be just eject and thus not keyworded ~x86-fbsd at=
=20
all.
When I'll be able to provide 0c features in unieject, I'd add that to 0c.
The need for usb/scsi eject is given by libgpod and related :)
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
--nextPart1290811.8nqGWzFPyj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBEcvOVe2h1+2mHVWMRAresAJ4vZd1F1p1AuSgeaZiZztOLVmpL4gCdG6uu
KHxAY+0kO2mviGyoTJ8jR0E=
=wyDd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1290811.8nqGWzFPyj--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list