From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fh5au-0000rF-UQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:04:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4JE381r023902; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:03:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4JDtOeJ028863 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:24 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9365C643AD for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21053-11 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iglu.bnet.local (d056199.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.56.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDE464406 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:55:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605182135.09014.carlo@gentoo.org> <200605190833.22248.uberlord@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200605190833.22248.uberlord@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1258836.OPLfp8jMPH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605191555.18085.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.624 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.904, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 0.624 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 07b7ac4f-eab3-48a3-9ee8-5e6075ca59b7 X-Archives-Hash: bbafa966ee7cdb8fa8cacd67c763adc9 --nextPart1258836.OPLfp8jMPH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 19 May 2006 09:33, Roy Marples wrote: > Maybe you haven't noticed, but baselayout is a virtual - which does make > things harder as the main "forks" (vserver and fbsd) sometimes break when > we add new things and they haven't synced up yet. I have nothing against a virtual. I just don't think polluting the profile= =20 subtree with alternative package mananger stuff is good idea. > But that's OK as they're supported I guess. > > Or are you saying that spb, other devs and people outside of Gentoo who h= as > submitted SoC applications about Paludis (or what that qaludis?) are just > going to wack it into the tree and then say "we're not going to support > it"? > > Of course not! No, I'm saying it's not the Gentoo package manager. Work on it, make it a=20 viable contender for replacing Portage, but as long it isn't, keep it in an= =20 overlay. Carsten --nextPart1258836.OPLfp8jMPH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEbc5GVwbzmvGLSW8RAmNVAJsFWY+I9LQJUb8+I2kbWFv6yBevagCeLkbl f2JrraZGnkyYrGwkeMTrVZI= =vN2h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1258836.OPLfp8jMPH-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list