From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fh5Z6-0000te-G7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:02:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4JE2Qs5002852; Fri, 19 May 2006 14:02:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4JDtAM8003600 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0A964351 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08680-05 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iglu.bnet.local (d056199.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.56.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2166438A for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:54:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605182135.09014.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060518211554.062d6aff@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060518211554.062d6aff@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4356903.3Km6VKTvtH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605191555.03201.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.604 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.924, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 0.604 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 9f3e62c9-1e87-475e-ad31-3f3c03a31d56 X-Archives-Hash: 76a7d33a4d89927e209773ff8ee51099 --nextPart4356903.3Km6VKTvtH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:15, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | Sure baselayout is. An there're others in the tree, But that doesn't > | mean these variants are supported (special cases like embedded aside). > > Sure, some of them are supported. By supported I mean all relevant packages in the tree install matching init= =20 scripts. That means officially supported, compared to such a package being= =20 maintained. Carsten --nextPart4356903.3Km6VKTvtH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEbc43VwbzmvGLSW8RAvotAJwNyuS6jXSKlN+f2L1vpKS558XIJQCgoZsu PRvMaEe5dRPg3kw+kxJm020= =sgqJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4356903.3Km6VKTvtH-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list