From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fgzeg-0005Z6-Ay for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 07:44:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4J7gUh2017522; Fri, 19 May 2006 07:42:30 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4J7ZxAZ008539 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 07:35:59 GMT Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [10.73.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3DA190041 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 08:35:59 +0100 (BST) From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <20060518213702.464305df@localhost> <200605190925.43172.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200605190925.43172.pauldv@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605190835.59198.uberlord@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 49d6d6c0-ebe1-45fd-ab59-03451c87fb9d X-Archives-Hash: 660e783974b9f5a4ce341467d33c84e1 On Friday 19 May 2006 08:25, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:37, Stephen Bennett wrote: > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 21:35:01 +0200 > > > > Carsten Lohrke wrote: > > > Sure baselayout is. An there're others in the tree, But that doesn't > > > mean these variants are supported (special cases like embedded > > > aside). > > > > So they're unsupported alternatives to one of the core parts of gentoo, > > which have profiles for them in the tree. What's different? > > They are at least partly supported. Also they do not aim to replace > baselayout as the main gentoo basic setup. As someone who's talked to initng devs since their project began and someone who has contribed code so that networking worked on init-ng with a Gentoo config I can assure you that their goal is to replace baselayout in Gentoo. OMFG - lets rip initng from the tree as it's going to replace my lovely baselayout -- Roy Marples Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list