From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgSp2-0003lt-Gj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:40:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HKdUtA010747; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:39:30 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HKYkKi024546 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:34:46 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so291572ugd for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:34:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=XtmyaFGMSWoiIMc1Z92KZLyeytUXuddBYMzxYdu90HfjiuvdRZ8cUwV4Dw4NfAPjlJRsW7O4dLz9bkgUss1tMRbd/zLzoBfnXhsoZppYHlWu7VEkgrjkoFjkLzkQk76zWfTTLdGXyUrEqcjizEn6a9g2Ztr5OcprHftZ4a/nvzY= Received: by 10.66.216.6 with SMTP id o6mr941076ugg; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.24.181]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id w40sm79451ugc.2006.05.17.13.34.44; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:34:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:34:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <1147895284.16876.66.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060517162649.4b43e0a8.tcort@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20060517162649.4b43e0a8.tcort@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1943629.fTio3Cg64k"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605172234.42979@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 28e0431f-80d0-4e9c-a6fc-c7b1ab2e109a X-Archives-Hash: 7970ff870857b0e28d52d72e50ee536e --nextPart1943629.fTio3Cg64k Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:26, Thomas Cort wrote: > rpm, stow, and dpkg are 100% incompatible with portage and I'm fairly > certain that upstream has no intentions of making them compatible, yet th= ey > are in the tree and stable on many arches. Are you also suggesting that we > mask them too? And you don't see profiles that uses any of them. Nor you'll ever see them.= =20 They are there mainly for developers' peace when they have to inspect RPMs = or=20 DEBs (I actually do that often). =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1943629.fTio3Cg64k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEa4jie2h1+2mHVWMRAiIrAJ9Ix5BIcx+7YnM8XNngakogpwLz6QCgoUxt Ysjsghx84zyrnA5SUkwvhcE= =3Sgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1943629.fTio3Cg64k-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list