From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgTS7-0000F4-LT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 21:21:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HLJ16b030257; Wed, 17 May 2006 21:19:01 GMT Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HLAaEH005343 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 21:10:36 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:10550 helo=localhost) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1FgTHr-0005P2-1T (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Wed, 17 May 2006 22:10:31 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:17:39 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060517221739.2a37f68d@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060517205347.GE8220@superlupo.rechner> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <20060516191631.GA18817@superlupo.rechner> <20060517092319.GA2997@superlupo> <20060517173238.6d364603@snowdrop.home> <20060517181157.GA8220@superlupo.rechner> <20060517201316.GA9559@netswarm.net> <20060517205347.GE8220@superlupo.rechner> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 1aef7c82-5879-4e4d-ab55-8cb0456f5d3e X-Archives-Hash: 19687b87975408376d6a8b19fd081ceb On Wed, 17 May 2006 22:53:47 +0200 Wernfried Haas wrote: > > The arguments are getting more and more "creative". It's almost > > like asking what we will do when gcc turns into a commercial > > product. > > The package manager is a central piece, if we ever want to change our > package manager we really should think about problems like that. So's the toolchain. > > Please try to stay realistic and don't invent strange new > > theoretical problems. > > Better safe then sorry. Better to stick to reality than invent pink elephants to back up a completely baseless assertion. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list