From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgSEp-0005UC-Cs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:03:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HJsakc029546; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:54:36 GMT Received: from psmtp01.wxs.nl (psmtp01-real.wxs.nl [195.121.247.14]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HJg5Oi028312 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:42:05 GMT Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (ip5457f303.direct-adsl.nl [84.87.243.3]) by psmtp01.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4HJg2ni021638 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 21:42:04 +0200 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:42:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605171729.11826.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20060517172535.3ea245e3@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060517172535.3ea245e3@localhost> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1567904.tVpkgS6cr4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605172142.07270.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 66f261aa-f317-4750-8a17-d59f9244af65 X-Archives-Hash: 768ffe4a0afedeaf8a2ecc2ec0ba17d2 --nextPart1567904.tVpkgS6cr4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:25, Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:29:11 +0200 > > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > The problem that I see with this is that it would tend to reinforce > > > the view that Paludis is becoming an officially supported package > > > manager, which at the moment at least it isn't. If people are > > > amenable to the idea though, I'm quite willing to set it up. > > > > In my opinion if paludis is not aiming to become an officially > > supported package manager there is no point in changing the tree to > > that in the first place. > > Note "at the moment". We want paludis to be a viable alternative to > Portage for most users, and part of that aim requires having an > available profile that doesn't bring Portage into the system set. An > "officially supported" package manager is a pretty vague term > anyway ... there's a group within Gentoo that will support it, and > groups that won't, as with any other part of the tree. Officially supported means that package maintainers must take it into accou= nt.=20 Repoman (or another QA tool) checks for compatibility on it, etc. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1567904.tVpkgS6cr4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEa3yPbKx5DBjWFdsRAq6vAJ4tTwxl1yMQlNiOGLJVzpXrWoOq9wCeNf7y s466oS98O6Hl+jJ+ASfzkTA= =6xaA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1567904.tVpkgS6cr4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list