From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgSE4-0006BY-Hc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:02:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HJrRtt020078; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:53:27 GMT Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HJb9cX016041 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:37:09 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:25493 helo=localhost) by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1FgRpS-0001vC-3T (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Wed, 17 May 2006 20:37:06 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:44:14 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060517204414.257f1d6b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200605172117.55627.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605171711.10418.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200605172117.55627.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 73be008f-7340-44fd-995f-0b7a416584b5 X-Archives-Hash: 316f74e1058ecf35e450a26e3a115aa5 On Wed, 17 May 2006 21:17:55 +0200 Paul de Vrieze wrote: > No, these packages are available to paludis, but not to portage. > Basically making a case for the use of paludis. I don't think that > the decision to replace portage should be made in that way. To reiterate here, we're not proposing introducing any paludis-specific features into ebuilds. Only profiles, and those profiles wouldn't provide anything that would provide users who wouldn't otherwise want to use paludis with any incentive to switch. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list