From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgSgq-0000Lp-GE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:32:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HKUl9F008373; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:30:47 GMT Received: from cs.ubishops.ca (CS.ubishops.ca [206.167.194.132]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HKQ1r3002915 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:26:02 GMT Received: from jungle.tomcort.com (HSE-Toronto-ppp135460.sympatico.ca [64.228.86.229]) by cs.ubishops.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9221C3A7A4 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:26:49 +0000 From: Thomas Cort To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-Id: <20060517162649.4b43e0a8.tcort@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1147895284.16876.66.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <20060517000910.5e1f1ccb@sven.genone.homeip.net> <200605170115.33956.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <200605171204.33647.pauldv@gentoo.org> <1147877875.16876.21.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060517160936.033a1cc1@snowdrop.home> <1147881924.16876.45.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060517172926.477daaed@snowdrop.home> <1147889572.16876.60.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060517195046.589df365@snowdrop.home> <1147895284.16876.66.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__17_May_2006_16_26_49_+0000_3nThJo9whOpQ7RkB" X-Archives-Salt: 5b198c90-b57d-48eb-a145-724e9299fcd7 X-Archives-Hash: d337e9798e5b2a4cdd854a08c9898fea --Signature=_Wed__17_May_2006_16_26_49_+0000_3nThJo9whOpQ7RkB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:48:04 -0400 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I also recommend that the package is masked in all > Gentoo profiles where a release is built against, since again, it is > 100% incompatible and upstream has now said that they have no intentions > on making it compatible. rpm, stow, and dpkg are 100% incompatible with portage and I'm fairly certa= in that upstream has no intentions of making them compatible, yet they are = in the tree and stable on many arches. Are you also suggesting that we mask= them too? ~tcort --Signature=_Wed__17_May_2006_16_26_49_+0000_3nThJo9whOpQ7RkB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEa07bQRqjKWbcq9ERAjI7AKCHpfWiLa5ktiLMzKXMogHT197xjwCg3Nu6 xBUZHmGp55khasGnDQsu1so= =aDet -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__17_May_2006_16_26_49_+0000_3nThJo9whOpQ7RkB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list