From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgMoi-0002Rx-OG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:16:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HECJmV027866; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:12:19 GMT Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HE1SgP020352 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:01:28 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:19602 helo=localhost) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1FgMaZ-0004pK-Uh (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Wed, 17 May 2006 15:01:23 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:08:30 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060517150830.30a6160d@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1147873370.16876.5.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605162150.34009@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <448F2081.5040202@gentoo.org> <200605162300.00110@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060516224749.3212fab6@localhost> <1147873370.16876.5.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 7c9e529b-bb1f-4605-b746-63b3d06b5a06 X-Archives-Hash: 96aa9b1ec99a31a2a6fc53679872d359 On Wed, 17 May 2006 09:42:50 -0400 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I would say it wouldn't hurt to start a project for ensuring Paludis > support in the Portage tree. It would give a bit more credibility to > your cause. The problem that I see with this is that it would tend to reinforce the view that Paludis is becoming an officially supported package manager, which at the moment at least it isn't. If people are amenable to the idea though, I'm quite willing to set it up. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list