From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgMpu-0005VN-UU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:17:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HECxrS021355; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:12:59 GMT Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HE042H030390 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:00:04 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.137] (helo=anti-virus01-08) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FgMZH-0002zH-Gl for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:00:03 +0100 Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1FgMZG-00049d-O7 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:00:02 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:59:41 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060517145941.0c5d083e@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200605171214.38540.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <20060517014253.15e92d29@localhost> <200605171214.38540.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 22fc7190-e4e4-4e51-ad3a-07d4647daa3c X-Archives-Hash: da08be0b991e10b2216e49c771a4452f On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:37 +0200 Paul de Vrieze wrote: | On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:42, Stephen Bennett wrote: | > paludis/packages: | > -*>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 | > *sys-apps/paludis | | Is there any reason that portage and paludis can not live together. Sure they can. That's not what that profile says. | With the contents of this profile I see no reason whatsoever to | include it in the tree. Paludis itself could easilly maintain a | blocker on portage. The rest is so boilerplate that it has no added | benefit of having paludis use the normal profiles. Again, that's not what that profile says. You need to read up on how the packages file works. Basically, lines starting with a - are removed from the existing set. | If paludis does not aim at replacing portage I'm sorry, but the term "Portage replacement" has been banned by the Gentoo thought police. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list