From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgMUh-0006eg-2g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:55:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HDqdrv032517; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:52:39 GMT Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HDkbpq013756 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:46:37 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.147] (helo=anti-virus03-10) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FgMMH-0003LY-CH for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:46:37 +0100 Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1FgMMG-0006a7-PI for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:46:36 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:46:14 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060517144614.3912d0f1@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200605170703.27881.ian@gentoo.org> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <200605161910.18919.ian@gentoo.org> <20060516183539.728117ca@snowdrop.home> <200605170703.27881.ian@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 111639aa-4268-4790-8a46-21b8533807c7 X-Archives-Hash: 9a7485c3693d9232af58e57eb1736abf On Wed, 17 May 2006 07:03:27 +0200 Christian Hartmann wrote: | > Please try to come up with something sliiightly more plausible than | > that when you're trying to attack something based upon your personal | > prejudices. Or is that really the best criticism you can find? | | Uh yeah. It's all just based on my personal prejudices. - Why did I | give paludis a try (on several VMs) then first? Remember when paludis | was segfaulting? Sure. You ran -svn (our release check procedures would have caught that before it hit a release anyway), found a bug, and it got fixed and a testcase was added to ensure that the same kind of issue didn't reoccur. Did you want a cookie or something? | That's how you want to understand it. It's easy to pervert the facts | if one just constantly writes the same FUD over and over again. But | this doesn't change anything. People will become tired to discuss the | profile changes. Then the profile will be added. - You win. - Hooray. | | It has always been that way. - Changes won't be made because they are | sensible. They will be made because people are sick off wasting their | time on discussions like that. - So am I. If you'd like far less time wasted on discussions, perhaps you and your co-offenders should try not posting huge numbers of emails that are free of technical objections. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list