From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgIM2-0002Se-J6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:30:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4H9SmsK005556; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:28:48 GMT Received: from mailrelay1.tu-graz.ac.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4H9Nvgl010465 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:23:58 GMT Received: from localhost (fanachpc62.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.185.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay1.tu-graz.ac.at (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4H9NuA2008537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:23:19 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060517092319.GA2997@superlupo> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <20060516191631.GA18817@superlupo.rechner> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060516191631.GA18817@superlupo.rechner> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r802 (Linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 129.27.10.18 X-Archives-Salt: 67405eb9-5ffe-4a57-b053-42a28dd223ad X-Archives-Hash: 6765aa62baa5cd3868d9f2074799a4ee --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:16:32PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: > This is not only about adding a profile, but if paludis is officially > supported by being in the tree and profiles, fixes for paludis get > into the tree etc, this sounds like paludis is a Gentoo project and users > will expect it to work and be supported. They will be allowed to ask > questions about something not working with paludis on the forums, > mailing lists, on irc etc without being off-topic. > So far and with respect to other distributions (like e.g. Vida, > Kororaa or whatever they were called) a rule of thumb was: > A Gentoo system uses the official portage tree, was installed using > the Gentoo installation guide using Gentoo stages, etc - and which was > rather implicit - using portage as package manager. As far i > understand it paludis differs from that in many ways. > So before the package manager gets optional and we support something > quite different we really should figure out what we consider a Gentoo > installation.=20 Does the lack of responses mean everyone agrees to my point? We really should figure that stuff out before we start integrating an externally written package manager we have no influence on whatsoever - otherwise=20 it would just be fair to do everything any other Gentoo based distribution demands from us as well. cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEauuHK/GNBBblp4ARAjSoAJ9ocpIlEmhzZ6Oe6KGqNMxohSL4nwCfWeHk NArudzK0+u82LM4onof7/6E= =Rbjs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list