From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fg7wM-0008Rk-SV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:22:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4GMLWnY009024; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:21:32 GMT Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4GMFm9V016857 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:15:48 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:6245 helo=localhost) by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1Fg7pS-0005DH-4i (Exim 4.54) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Tue, 16 May 2006 23:15:46 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:53 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060516232253.2c589768@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060516231453.171002b9@epia.jeroenr-c2.orkz.net> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <446A1B5D.8040402@gentoo.org> <200605162105.52805.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20060516231453.171002b9@epia.jeroenr-c2.orkz.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: 1aeb731c-59d9-4b32-b0a3-689ca3f1546a X-Archives-Hash: b3221dc10bb6e578a565b4c3189162a6 On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:14:53 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > This should not be a side note IMHO. If that profile is in the tree, > who in Gentoo will support it? I will. > Does the Gentoo Project not support the > entire tree all of a sudden? There are plenty of ebuilds in the tree marked as unsupported by gentoo. Probably some profiles too, though I can't name them for certain off the top of my head. > 1) Is bugsy ready for this, with appropriate categories in place? Paludis-related bugs can be marked as invalid and the user directed to Paludis' bug tracker on berlios.de. Alternatively, if our friendly Bugzilla admins want to create categories I won't complain. I don't see a need for it though. > 2) Is there an alias addy for Paludis related issues, so that Paludis > users can communicate with members of some Paludis profile team for > support? For issues related to Gentoo packaging of paludis, bugs can be filed to the ebuild maintainer listed in metadata.xml. For other paludis-related issues, there are mailing lists mentioned on the web site. > 3) Is documentation support in place to refer Paludis profile users to > when they fail to understand "reason" and demand Gentoo support for > issues with the Paludis profile? http://paludis.berlios.de/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list