From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fg5ub-0007kQ-6E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:12:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4GK9rhq016625; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:09:53 GMT Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4GJvthL025035 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:57:56 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.136] (helo=anti-virus01-07) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fg5g3-0003wN-Sx for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:57:55 +0100 Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Fg5g3-0002CT-A5 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:57:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:57:32 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles Message-ID: <20060516205732.32a047fd@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <446A2398.9070705@gentoo.org> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <446A2398.9070705@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8d88ffa3-0c37-4473-9078-fe6688447994 X-Archives-Hash: ff29bc0fb6520997c21bdce0443a15fe On Tue, 16 May 2006 20:10:16 +0100 Daniel Drake wrote: | Stephen Bennett wrote: | > If noone has any strong reasonable objections, I'd like to add a | > Paludis profile to the tree. | | I think that this should be the decision of the Portage developers. | If there is any burden other than the points you mentioned, it | directly or indirectly falls on them. Adding a new profile doesn't affect Portage unless Portage is told to use that profile. And anyone telling Portage to use *any* invalid profile is going to be in for a shock. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list