From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FbyTh-0004h6-92 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:28:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k45BQGbh028785; Fri, 5 May 2006 11:26:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k45BKOpV001765 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 11:20:24 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D7464329 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 11:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11372-10 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 11:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iglu.bnet.local (d056060.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.56.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3C864312 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 11:20:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:20:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605041629.56633.mpkirkland@shaw.ca> <20060505083235.70609786@c1358217.kevquinn.com> In-Reply-To: <20060505083235.70609786@c1358217.kevquinn.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1347696.sWWKxkS6oo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605051320.15676.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.365 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.163, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 0.365 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 309d3d4e-ca3b-4aef-b422-a3da6bd6883c X-Archives-Hash: 84fe0ba32c00a634cd5d7a41070a8b90 --nextPart1347696.sWWKxkS6oo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 05 May 2006 08:32, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > If you use specific versions in the package.keywords file (i.e. do > "=3Dcategory/package-version-revision ~arch" instead of > "category/package ~arch", this doesn't happen. Hardcoding specific ~arch versions or revisions unless absolutely needed is= a=20 bad idea. Remember that we don't do GLSA's for testing stuff. If bleeding=20 edge, then bleeding edge. Carsten --nextPart1347696.sWWKxkS6oo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.20 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEWzTvVwbzmvGLSW8RAkO9AKC8oFaBgaI2s92/cRsRektNxl+ljwCgoj0Y Wn34j7Tpv9sLstO0M7KgNA4= =QnML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1347696.sWWKxkS6oo-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list