From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Fa1rO-0005CQ-Cf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:40:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3U2dsHh020963; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:39:54 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3U2bnjT004279 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:37:49 GMT Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 867) id 24484643D8; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:37:48 +0000 From: Renat Lumpau To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union + suggestion for global dev conference (at bottom, if you want to skip) Message-ID: <20060430023748.GC367@woodpecker.gentoo.org> References: <20060428171453.GB62035@watcher.kimaker.com> <1146346391.29589.104.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <44541928.6060702@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44541928.6060702@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 6ffadc9b-2741-4daa-bb47-f48f073d2a4f X-Archives-Hash: 00d45988e1c1a315c22718e840693137 --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:52PM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: > Stuart Herbert wrote: >=20 > >> __Problem: CVS__ > >> > >> CVS is one of the worst application ever created. =20 > >=20 > > Hear, hear. > >=20 > > I'd like to see a move to Subversion made a priority for 2006. If there > > are problems with Subversion's performance with our tree, engage with > > its authors to obtain improvements. But get it done. >=20 > Here's an idea I had tonight. Since we're going to be doing the Google > SoC this summer, perhaps a great project would be having someone work on > this migration (or at least do an unbiased test implementation). I'd be > willing to provide an infra server for testing/development. I don't see > much problem at least trying to work out all the details. I don't think > infra will go with any change unless there is a clear, detailed > migration plan with proper back-out plans also. The tree is the most > important part of our distribution and I'm not going to let such a > migration go by without proper planning and testing. After the test > implementation is done and has been fully tested, perhaps the council > could make the final decision if infra is happy with the > implementation/migration details. It looks like if/when implemented, GLEP 44 (Manifest2) will significantly r= educe the number of small files in the tree. Whoever ends up doing the initial benchmarking and testing should probably keep this in mind. --=20 Renat Lumpau all things web-apps C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA America - land of the free* *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c. --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEVCL8EzitwsaoONoRAooiAJ477ZYTd8LNAVsGbXTUVLtZFlopwQCghp3W 2Je+Lo+3TsNTPG1WMTdXmIQ= =rGst -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list